![]() 3RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Aichi, Japan.2Department of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.1Department of Precision Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.Yamasaki 4, Moeka Yokoyama 3, Fady Alnajjar 3,5, Noriaki Hattori 6, Kouji Takahashi 7, Takanori Fujii 7, Hironori Otomune 7, Ichiro Miyai 7, Atsushi Yamashita 1 and Hajime Asama 1 ![]() I guess that’s part of why digital identity is such an intriguing and compelling area.Ruoxi Wang 1, Qi An 2 *, Ningjia Yang 3, Hiroki Kogami 1, Kazunori Yoshida 1, Hiroshi Yamakawa 1, Hiroyuki Hamada 1, Shingo Shimoda 3, Hiroshi R. ![]() However, the use of a social media presence as part of the authentication and verification process also has great potential. The potential for this personal data to no longer be under the user’s control highlights challenges that face future identity management systems. This conceal versus reveal paradigm becomes problematic when platforms such as Facebook become a central login point for a range of everyday activities resulting in users potentially piggy backing access to everything from personal photos to political party preferences as part of the login process. From a social media perspective, its all about augmenting digital identity with personal content produced by the user. From a security perspective digital identity usually refers to reducing a person’s identity so the least amount of information is revealed - anonymity. Digital identity as a concept is really constructed so differently between the diverse groups designing technology in the space. These distinctions are important to understand. Cards can be lost or stolen, an individual can be coerced into allowing access to unauthorised person, therefore using multi- factors of verification and/or authentication is important to strengthen security in higher risk environments. This, obviously, carries a much higher degree of certainty (although, if you believe the movies, it’s not impossible), therefore, it is also a form of authentication.Īuthentication is the difference between verifying data is correct (the correct card is used and allows the correct access or that the right PIN has been entered) and adding to that the assurance that the person using this data is who they should be. This time the verification also assumes that the individual cannot give their fingerprint, retina or face to another person. Both the card/fob and the PIN are a method of verification, they function to verify the individual based on the assumptions above, i.e the card/fob and the PIN will not be passed on to another person.īiometric scanners offer an additional level of assurance as biometric information is both a form of verification and also a form of authentication. The PIN is something the individual knows, they should be the only person who knows this. The card or fob is something the individual has, it should only be in their possession and not given to someone else. In addition, for a more enhanced solution, biometrics can also be implemented, using biometric information from that particular individual to identify them such as iris scanning, fingerprints or facial recognition scanners. Access control solutions usually consist of a card or fob which is assigned to an individual, sometimes along with a personal identification number (PIN) which only the individual knows. But it’s important that we recognise the differences between these two terms, so we can implement our security solutions in the most effective way.Īn easy way to look at verification vs authentication and see how they are used in different ways is to consider the concept of access control. When the industry itself often fails to differentiate accurately between the meaning of verification vs the meaning of authentication it’s no wonder these terms are mixed up on a frequent basis on the working level.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |